![]() But when I attempt anything more, like adjusting brightness or levels of noise, etc, the programme frequently freezes or totally crashes. If I just use the default settings then Click Save Image, everything works fine. I am continuing to do my main editing with Photo Plus, so it is only the RAW Conversion stage that I am talking about here.Īdmitedly, 90% of my problems are probably of my own making but I find RT needs very slow and careful adjustments. My experiments, so far, suggest that when I can achieve success, the results are sharper and cleaner images. In general I find 3.0 to be easier to use and a bit more stable. ![]() I have experimented with versions 2.4 and 3.0. The Highlight Recovery is little more than excessive underexposure and I usually get better results by just tweaking the Exposure settings.Īfter hearing several people recommending Raw Therapee, I had given it a trial but found it to be very unstable. About equal to Canon DPP in overall performance. It's like they didn't want to copy the way of doing things simply just because that's how it was done in photoshop.I use Serif Photo Plus X3 for editing and although I am generally happy with the programme I have found their RAW Converter to be a bit on the basic side. Well, it's been a long time since I used it so I've forgotten most of the specific things, but it had lots of things you could do in photoshop in a single step, but in affinity you could only do them in several steps. I'd just like to add that they're good products, especially for the price, but they're not quite there yet. I was really hoping I could get rid of adobe products but I ended up having to have both installed just to be able to do my job.Įdit. The affinity products are completely fine for hobby use, but I would rather shoot myself in the face than use them 8 hours a day. ![]() You can just select a shape in illustrator and press inset path and it's done, but you had to do it in several steps in affinity designer, and it wasn't still perfect. It's like they didn't want to copy the way of doing things simply just because that's how it was done in photoshop.Īlso lots of bugs with brushes, especially antialiasing and exporting, also all the affinity programs are still so "new", that there are things you simply can't do with them because the features are missing, or, you can do something but it takes considerable amount of time to do, for example in illustrator there is inset path, which is one of the most basic and most used function, which is (or at least was, I don't know the current status) missing completely, and it has been asked for several years by the users. As of last time I checked that process is vastly faster in the Adobe ecosystem than with anything else.Ĭlick to expand.Well, it's been a long time since I used it so I've forgotten most of the specific things, but it had lots of things you could do in photoshop in a single step, but in affinity you could only do them in several steps. So that's how I work: sort/rename in Bridge, adjust in ACR then convert in LR. However, I do all my sorting and adjustments in Bridge/ACR because LR is painfully slow in that process. ![]() LR is also about 5x faster than Photoshop for reasons I can't explain - from what I can see LR makes better use of multiprocessing then PS. FYI that's the only reason I use LR - batch conversion. It was a huge difference as of a couple years ago. I usually then dump the raw images to TIFF and I found Lightroom to be significantly faster than competing products in that process - like 5x faster. Adobe Bridge and ACR certainly struggle with that process but I found them better than doing the same with competing products. When I process them I usually need to open them up in a raw processor (ACR) and make adjustments then apply those adjustments to thousands of images. Because I do timelapse it's not unusual for me to capture 10,000 images over a couple days. It's the file handling that is probably the biggest one for me. I can remember, however, where I found PS to be better: masking/selections and batch file handling/processing. It's been a couple years since I tried something else for photo editing and I can't remember what I've tried.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |